Describe
Bring the task, the source information, and the policies your experts already use.
Enterprise agents - Solutions Overview
See how agents fit your team’s work.
Illustrative workflows for retail, healthcare, and financial services.
Explore how domain experts could use LatentSpin to review shelf placement, prepare claims appeals, assess lending exceptions, and investigate compliance alerts—with evidence and human judgment built into the work.
Where LatentSpin fits
Built for expert work that keeps changing.
Start with a repeatable task where people review evidence, apply judgment, and handle exceptions. The examples below show how teams can build, inspect, run, and teach agents across different kinds of work. They are starting points for a workflow shaped around your team.
Example · Retail operations
Rohan, shelf-placement compliance agent
Compare shelf photos with placement requirements, prepare a compliance report, and give store managers a clear list of items to review.
Who owns the workA retail operations manager who knows the supplier agreements and store standards.
What your team provides
Shelf photos
Supplier placement guides
Approved seasonal exceptions
The plan you inspect
- Match each shelf photo to the relevant placement requirements and show the checks in the proposed plan.
- Compare and score the visible placement, flagging unclear photos or missing requirements for review.
- Draft a report and recommended store-manager actions. Ordering is a possible downstream extension, outside this example.
How you teach
An approved seasonal display is flagged because it differs from the standard layout.
Correction: The manager explains that a seasonal display with an approved supplier tag meets this requirement.
Future reports can apply the approved exception with its supporting evidence.
What this can support
Consistent review criteria
Clear store-manager follow-up
Human review. A manager reviews uncertain scores, approves reports, and decides what action the store should take.
Example · Healthcare
Claire, denials and appeals agent
Review denied claims, gather the relevant evidence, and draft an appeal for the revenue cycle team to inspect before submission.
Who owns the workA revenue cycle manager who understands payer policies and appeal requirements.
What your team provides
Denial and remittance data
Clinical documentation
Applicable payer policies
The plan you inspect
- Show a plan for checking the denial reason, policy criteria, and supporting documentation.
- Gather relevant evidence and draft an appeal with references for the reviewer to inspect.
- Prepare a submission-ready draft and track outcomes through the connected systems agreed during onboarding.
How you teach
A missing-information appeal uses generic phrasing and omits a payer-specific documentation requirement.
Correction: The manager adds the required documentation language and explains when it applies.
Future drafts can reflect the payer’s documentation requirements.
What this can support
Evidence-backed drafts
Consistent policy review
Human review. The revenue cycle team approves appeal submissions. Missing evidence, sensitive cases, and uncertain recommendations route to a person.
Example · Financial services
Verity, consumer lending agent
Assemble application evidence and recommend a review path so the underwriting team can inspect the reasoning behind a lending recommendation.
Who owns the workAn underwriting manager who knows the credit union’s policies and member context.
What your team provides
Application and bureau data
Authorized cash-flow records
Current underwriting policies
The plan you inspect
- Propose a plan for collecting evidence, checking policy criteria, and identifying exceptions.
- Prepare a recommendation with the supporting evidence and policy references visible to the reviewer.
- Route thin-file or policy-exception cases to the appropriate underwriting review.
How you teach
A thin-file applicant is routed toward decline without considering two years of authorized payroll history.
Correction: The manager requests a second look under the credit union’s cash-flow review policy and explains the evidence required.
The agent can surface similar cases for a second look, with the required evidence.
What this can support
Clearer evidence review
Consistent exception routing
Human review. The underwriting team owns lending decisions and approves every adverse action. Customer data is handled within the agreed cloud deployment and access boundaries.
Example · Financial services
Kevin, AML/KYC triage agent
Organize screening evidence, identify missing information, and prepare a triage recommendation for a compliance analyst to review.
Who owns the workAn AML/KYC operations lead who knows the organization’s review and escalation policies.
What your team provides
Authorized customer records
Screening alerts
Documented review policies
The plan you inspect
- Propose checks for the alert, supporting identity evidence, and any missing information.
- Prepare a case summary with sources and unresolved questions for the analyst to inspect.
- Recommend a review or escalation path while keeping consequential decisions with the compliance team.
How you teach
An alert summary treats a similar name as a confirmed match without enough identifying evidence.
Correction: The analyst explains which additional identifiers are required and when the case must be escalated.
Future summaries can distinguish a possible match from a confirmed one and surface missing evidence.
What this can support
Structured case summaries
Traceable review evidence
Human-led escalation
Human review. Analysts approve dispositions and escalations. The agent does not independently close sensitive alerts or make reporting decisions.
How it works
Start with one repeatable task. The examples above are illustrative; scope, integrations, review boundaries, and outcomes are agreed for each engagement.
Review
Inspect the proposed plan and mark the decisions that need a person’s approval.
Run
Review outputs and exceptions with the evidence and execution trail in view.
Teach
Explain a correction and the reasoning behind it.
Your organization’s learned expertise stays private and belongs to you. Candidate lessons are evaluated and approved before becoming versioned model updates.
Design partner program
Bring us a workflow your team knows well.
Choose one repeatable task with clear inputs, review points, and an outcome you can assess. We will work with the people who know it best to shape an inspectable, teachable agent.
An early-access engagement typically starts with one real task over roughly 1–2 weeks and a few hours of your team’s time. Scope and success criteria are agreed together.
Build with us
Start with your everyday work.
Tell us where your experts spend time reviewing, correcting, or handling exceptions.